Things to Know Before Investing in DePIN Node Sales

Let's examine node sale cases focusing on the Datagram example

Things to Know Before Investing in DePIN Node Sales

Let's examine node sale cases focusing on the Datagram example

Things to Know Before Investing in DePIN Node Sales

Let's examine node sale cases focusing on the Datagram example

Date

Aug 4, 2025

Following the news of Datagram Network's node sale starting on August 10th, I'd like to organize some considerations when investing in DePIN projects. Since Datagram's CEO, Jason "Bitbender" Brink, was formerly the Blockchain President at Gala Games, let's analyze what aspects we should examine through the case study of Gala Games, which had a similar structure.

Gala Games Case Study: Lessons Worth Referencing

Situation Summary

During the NFT and metaverse boom of 2021-2022, Gala Games was a prominent blockchain gaming platform. As a project involving Eric Schiermeyer, co-founder of Zynga, it garnered considerable attention.

Characteristics of Gala Node (Founders Node) Sales Structure

Price Structure

  • Started at $2,000 initially and increased gradually

  • Nodes eventually sold for up to $71,000

  • Tiered structure where prices increased every 100 nodes sold

Token Distribution

  • 50% of total tokens allocated to node operators

  • Remainder used for team and ecosystem development

Business Expansion

  • Started with gaming and expanded to Gala Music, Gala Film

  • Aggressive marketing including large-scale offline events (Galaverse)

Current Situation and Implications

Issues Faced

  • Legal disputes between co-founders in 2023 ($130M scale)

  • Eric Schiermeyer vs Wright Thurston lawsuit battle

  • Issues raised about using company funds for private jet purchases

Impact on Investors

  • Early participants may have gained some profits

  • However, investors who participated at high prices later suffered significant losses

  • Gaming-related NFT price drops and project delays

Datagram Project Status Analysis

Project Overview

  • Claims to be an AI-based Hyper-Fabric Network

  • Aims to build real-time communication infrastructure

  • Claims to have 200+ enterprises and 1.2M users

Node Sale Structure

  • August 10th: Preferred Whitelist

  • August 11th: Pre-sale Whitelist

  • August 12th: Public Sale

  • Total of 25,000 nodes for limited sale

  • Plans to allocate 50% to node operators

Notable Investment Background

  • Participation from Avalanche Fund, Animoca Brands, etc.

  • Completed $4M pre-seed funding

  • Plans to build own L1 chain based on Avalanche

Considerations When Investing in DePIN Projects

Technical Review Points

Actual Implementation Status Check

  • Whether the promised technology actually works

  • Performance verification possible through demos or testnets

  • Real advantages compared to existing cloud services

Investment Decision Checklist

✅ Pre-Participation Checklist

  1. Team Transparency: Identity and background disclosure of core members, actual performance from past projects, level of community communication

  2. Technical Feasibility: Working prototypes or testnets, specificity of technical roadmap, external technical audits or verification

  3. Token Economics Rationality: Sustainability of node operator rewards, clarity of token value appreciation drivers, excessive inflation risks

  4. Personal Risk Management: Participate within amounts you can afford to lose, risk diversification through diversified investment, consider potential long-term liquidity restrictions

⚠️ Warning Signs

  • Excessively flashy marketing compared to vague technical explanations

  • Repeating problem patterns in team's past history

  • Too-good-to-be-true promises (high returns, no risk, etc.)

  • Evasive responses to community questions

Following the news of Datagram Network's node sale starting on August 10th, I'd like to organize some considerations when investing in DePIN projects. Since Datagram's CEO, Jason "Bitbender" Brink, was formerly the Blockchain President at Gala Games, let's analyze what aspects we should examine through the case study of Gala Games, which had a similar structure.

Gala Games Case Study: Lessons Worth Referencing

Situation Summary

During the NFT and metaverse boom of 2021-2022, Gala Games was a prominent blockchain gaming platform. As a project involving Eric Schiermeyer, co-founder of Zynga, it garnered considerable attention.

Characteristics of Gala Node (Founders Node) Sales Structure

Price Structure

  • Started at $2,000 initially and increased gradually

  • Nodes eventually sold for up to $71,000 (approximately 95 million KRW)

  • Tiered structure where prices increased every 100 nodes sold

Token Distribution

  • 50% of total tokens allocated to node operators

  • Remainder used for team and ecosystem development

Business Expansion

  • Started with gaming and expanded to Gala Music, Gala Film

  • Aggressive marketing including large-scale offline events (Galaverse)

Current Situation and Implications

Issues Faced

  • Legal disputes between co-founders in 2023 ($130M scale)

  • Eric Schiermeyer vs Wright Thurston lawsuit battle

  • Issues raised about using company funds for private jet purchases

Impact on Investors

  • Early participants may have gained some profits

  • However, investors who participated at high prices later suffered significant losses

  • Gaming-related NFT price drops and project delays

Datagram Project Status Analysis

Project Overview

  • Claims to be an AI-based Hyper-Fabric Network

  • Aims to build real-time communication infrastructure

  • Claims to have 200+ enterprises and 1.2M users

Node Sale Structure

  • August 10th: Preferred Whitelist

  • August 11th: Pre-sale Whitelist

  • August 12th: Public Sale

  • Total of 25,000 nodes for limited sale

  • Plans to allocate 50% to node operators

Notable Investment Background

  • Participation from Avalanche Fund, Animoca Brands, etc.

  • Completed $4M pre-seed funding

  • Plans to build own L1 chain based on Avalanche

Considerations When Investing in DePIN Projects

Technical Review Points

Actual Implementation Status Check

  • Whether the promised technology actually works

  • Performance verification possible through demos or testnets

  • Real advantages compared to existing cloud services

Tokenomics Transparency

  • Accurate token distribution ratios and schedule

  • Team token lockup period and vesting schedule

  • Sustainability of node operator reward mechanism

Team and Governance Analysis

Past Track Record Review

  • Team members' performance in previous projects

  • Whether they actually delivered on promises

  • Communication methods and transparency with community

Risk Management System

  • Robustness of decision-making structure

  • Conflict resolution mechanisms

  • Response plans for regulatory risks

Market Environment Considerations

Competition Analysis

  • Differentiation from existing AWS, Google Cloud, etc.

  • Advantages over other DePIN projects

  • Potential for securing real enterprise customers

Timing and Market Receptivity

  • Current DePIN market maturity

  • Matching actual user needs

  • Potential regulatory changes

Investment Decision Checklist

✅ Pre-Participation Checklist

  1. Team Transparency

  • Identity and background disclosure of core members

  • Actual performance from past projects

  • Level of community communication

  1. Technical Feasibility

  • Working prototypes or testnets

  • Specificity of technical roadmap

  • External technical audits or verification

  1. Token Economics Rationality

  • Sustainability of node operator rewards

  • Clarity of token value appreciation drivers

  • Excessive inflation risks

  1. Personal Risk Management

  • Participate within amounts you can afford to lose

  • Risk diversification through diversified investment

  • Consider potential long-term liquidity restrictions

⚠️ Warning Signs

  • Excessively flashy marketing compared to vague technical explanations

  • Repeating problem patterns in team's past history

  • Too-good-to-be-true promises (high returns, no risk, etc.)

  • Evasive responses to community questions

Personal Perspective and Conclusion

I believe DePIN is certainly one of the important directions for future internet infrastructure. However, it's still uncertain which projects will actually succeed.

In Datagram's case, the team's past experience and investor lineup are positive factors. On the other hand, how to interpret the experience at Gala Games may vary from person to person. It could be lessons learned from failure, or patterns that may repeat.

Personally, I recommend the following approach:

  1. Start Small: Consider participating with a small portion of your overall portfolio

  2. Continuous Monitoring: Observe actual performance after mainnet launch

  3. Multi-angle Verification: Fact-check through multiple information sources

  4. Avoid Emotional Decisions: Make decisions based on rational analysis rather than FOMO

The future promised by DePIN projects is attractive, but the path may not be smooth. I hope wise investors will make their own judgments by considering both opportunities and risks in a balanced way.

Most importantly, investment is your responsibility, and I urge you to participate only within amounts you can afford to lose. is your responsibility, and I urge you to only within amounts you can afford to lose.

This article contains personal analysis and opinions, and is not investment advice or recommendation. All investment decisions should be based on sufficient personal research (DYOR).

Next

© 2025 AirdropTrend. All rights reserved.

© 2025 AirdropTrend. All rights reserved.

© 2025 AirdropTrend. All rights reserved.